Boardman Clark Attorneys Named to 2018 Wisconsin Super Lawyers Top Attorney List

Nine Boardman & Clark LLP attorneys were recently named to the Wisconsin Super Lawyers list as top attorneys in their practice areas.  Each year, no more than five percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.  The firm also had three young attorneys name to the publication’s “Rising Stars” list, which recognizes standout attorneys that have been practicing for less than ten years.

Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area. The result is a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of exceptional attorneys.

The Super Lawyers lists are published nationwide in Super Lawyers Magazines and in leading city and regional magazines and newspapers across the country. For more information about Super Lawyers, visit SuperLawyers.com.

The Boardman Clark attorneys named Super Lawyers honorees in this year's edition include:

The firm’s Rising Stars honorees include:


__

Boardman & Clark LLP is one of Madison’s largest and longest-standing law firms. The firm serves individuals, a wide range of business and corporate clients, school districts and local governments. Its areas of service include litigation, franchise and dealership law, business law, taxation, estate planning and probate, intellectual property, family law, municipal law, banking, labor and employment, land use, elder services, real estate, and school law.

The Latest

Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Required Again

Business Minute | 12.23.24

On December 23, 2024, the Fifth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals granted the Federal government’s motion for a temporary stay of the lower court’s order and injunction that had paused enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA).